2012年3月21日星期三

Louis Vuitton and Marc Jacob Exhibition Gets Surprise Visit from Kristen ... - Gather Celebs News Channel

After the drama of the Louis Vuitton fashion show today, that theme continued later at the label's, "Les Art Decoratifs," exhibition, held to celebrate the work, history, and relationship of the power fashion house and its creative designer, Marc Jacobs. Earlier, a navy, "orient express" train entrance kicked off the fun at the start of LV/MJ fashion show, to the sound of cheers from a wowed audience. And the show itself, "old world" luxurious long coats, skirts and fashion forward dresses with a mix of bejewelled, leather bags (carried by porters, naturally), didn't disappoint either.

Amazing train entrance at the LV/MJ show. Source: fashiontelegraph.co.uk Courtesy of Reuters

After the show, things got even more fabulous when uber-couple Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson showed up at the LV/MJ exhibition later that same evening. Kristen, rocking a short, body-hugging, black leopard dress by the label and white, detailed heels, was accompanied by a casually dressed Robert, wearing a baseball cap (well he wasn't working), and Kristen's publicist Ruth Bernstein. Of course, it's perhaps not so shocking the loved-up couple were there seeing as they did visit the LV showroom earlier this week, but it was still a surprise to many—judging by the reaction on the Internet.

imagebam.com

Word of the couple's arrival at the exhibition came via numerous fashion journalists on Twitter. Courtney Justice tweeted, "Kristen Stewart just arrived at the Louis Vuitton - Marc Jacobs exhibition opening tonight!#PFW", then seconds later added, "Rob looks good. #JustSayin." James Myers from Digital News Agency, tweeted, "standing in a room w/ Gwyneth, SJP, R-Pats and Kristen Stewart, Diana Aggron, Marc Jacobs," and stylist, Mandy Merheb tweeted, "spotted Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart walking hand in hand to the Marc Jacobs Louis Vuittion exhibition" - along with a picture of the couple.

pic.twitter.com/d8K0688q

The high fashion event was also quite the celebrity coup. Joining Robert and Kristen at the star-packed exhibition were Charlotte Gainsbourg, actress Sarah Jessica Parker, Brit singer Corinne Bailey Rae, socialite and model Poppy Delevigne, and oh, Karl Lagerfield. Just an average Wednesday night in Paris then.

On a trip that saw Kristen and Robert take in a meet with Paul McCartney and dinner with friends from On The Road, their appearance at the place to be tonight comes at the close of a spectacular Paris Fashion Week. It seems the City of Light and love delivered exactly that—and then some. Kristen can be seen in the clip below, and if you can spot Robert, your eyesight's fantastic!

Please provide details below to help Gather review this content. If it is found to be inappropriate and in violation of the Gather Terms of Service, action will be taken.Please select the part of the post you are reporting.Please select why you are reporting this content.Please enter a description.
ed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier Handbags

Louis Vuitton-Marc Jacobs exhibit: It's the bag, stupid, the immutable bag - Washington Post

The bag pattern was first patented in 1877 but it can still be seen — almost unchanged — on the Parisian boulevards more than 130 years later. This is thanks to house founder Louis Vuitton, and since 1997, creative director Marc Jacobs.

Both their stories are woven together in a colorful exhibit that spans over a century of fashion history.

The exhibit takes the visitor from the founder’s humble beginnings as a case-packer to the fantastical runway shows that transformed the house into one of the world’s biggest names, with a revenue last year of €2.5 billion. Though both men are from different centuries, the exhibition asks whether they have more in common than meets the eye.

There’s a small clue in the first room: portraits of the two men hang side by side, both sporting mustaches in the style of their age.

“They’re both visionaries, though they would be the last to admit it,” said museum curator Pamela Golbin, “and they both lived an exact same story at a decisive moment in fashion.”

Louis Vuitton faced industrialization of the 19th century and new train travel while Marc Jacobs was confronted with 1990s’ changing demands for marketing “making fashion truly globalized for the first time,” Golbin said.

The story began for Louis Vuitton as a trunk-packer for rich Parisians, a job in which he was able to hone a mastery of every bolt, lock and corner of travel cases from across the French capital. He built on his knowledge, finally opening his own house in 1854.

The Orient Express was new and fashionable, and the meteoric rise of haute couture under Charles Frederic Worth meant better-dressed women went on trips with more and more clothes — that needed cases to fit them in.

Such was the demand that the norm in the late-19th century norm, as one display shows, was for a traveling lady to take a staggering 30 large cases on each trip.

From this a thousand trunks were born, all perfectly preserved with their original wax coatings and all viewable at the exhibit: hat trunks, toiletries trunks, trunks that pulled out as a chest of drawers, metal trunks for humid countries. For the trendy yet tired, there was a trunk that folded out into a bed.

As it still does under Jacobs, the house had a sense for the avant-garde as early as 1890: one gargantuan case boasts the title the “Never Full Bag.”

Then there was the radical facelift of the 1990s. Glossy fashion magazines landed and globalized demands meant that labels had to up their game and expand, or sink. Creative talent was no longer the only criteria sought by the industry: instead “marketing” became the buzz word.

Enter Marc Jacobs, already a big name in the fashion industry, to design the Louis Vuitton house’s first ready-to-wear collection, 143 bag-filled years later.

Using his corporate knowledge and irreverent humor he revamped the bags and shoes — the company’s financial lifeline.

A vivid display of mannequins kneeling captures the transformation from past to present perfectly: each model has a classic Louis Vuitton bag placed on her back — covered in graffiti.

The exhibit shows other irreverent sources of musings for the designer, including a 2003 manga film by Japanese artist Takashi Murakami that is used to revamp the traditional LV monogram.

The continued growth of the house comes down to his versatility.

Marc Jacobs fall-winter runway show featured models in Edwardian hats exiting a reconstructed train that might have been the turn-of-the-century Orient Express. So there we have it, the full circle.

But, the designer mused backstage, “Whatever you try, clothes never really can live in the past. They are worn now so they are modern, with a modern take. I’m not nostalgic.”

The exhibit “Louis Vuitton-Marc Jacobs” runs March 9-Sept. 16.

Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


ed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier Handbags

Designing women - Jamaica Gleaner

Tony Deyal, Contributor

If the Devil wears Prada, who wears Louis Vuitton? The answer came this carnival when the prime minister of Trinidad and Tobago, Kamla Persad-Bissessar, showed up at a pre-carnival event, headlining Machel Montano, in a pair of US$795 boots with the Louis Vuitton brand. According to the Trinidad Express, "They are described as a 'punchy sneaker boot in grained leather and sequins Louis Vuitton shoes'."

The responses were mixed - some blaming the newspaper for highlighting celebrity trivia and others saying that it is a bad example for the prime minister to spend so much on shoes when there are children who are starving.

One writer with the nom de plume 'Trini Chick' commented, "I'm no Kamla fan, but I think she's entitled to spend her money how she pleases. More important is the shock in knowing those ugly shoes, that did not match the outfit, cost $5,000. That's the shameful part."

'Lil Trini Woman' advised, "Take your education, do well in school, stay off drugs, and do the right thing, and you will be able to afford things like this."

'Bacteriocidal' was adamant: "Our Caribbean queen deserves the best that money can buy. She worked for her dollar."

One of the prime minister's critics, most likely someone of my generation, remembered the Nancy Sinatra 1966 hit, These Boots Are Made for Walkin. He even quoted some of the lyrics from the chorus, "These boots are made for walkin'/And that's what they will do/And one of these days these boots are gonna/Walk all over you."

Clearly he believes, like many other critics, that the present government of T&T is trampling on the rights of the citizenry, a sentiment similar to the Barbados situation that prompted Gabby's Government Boots in 1984.

Several people also pointed out that carnival costumes cost more than the PM's shoes, and that since it was not the public purse paying for the footwear, there was no problem.

Compared with Mrs O

Comparisons were also made about the difference in style between the T&T prime minister and the US first lady, Michelle Obama. There is, in fact, a website (mrs-o.com) which is dedicated to "following the fashion and style of First Lady Michelle Obama since 2008". The site tells you, for instance, "The president and first lady attended the 2011 National Medal of Arts and Humanities Medal in the East Room at the White House today. On the style front, Mrs O wore a mixed-print wrap dress paired with black boots."

Other fashion titbits include: "Mrs O wears a Rachel Roy Deep Sea Blue Crepe Drape Neck Dress", and the site link lets you know it costs US$445 and also does a "Jason Wu for Target Sleeveless Chiffon Dress in Navy Floral". You are also told that the dress is sold out online but available from some Target stores.

Recently, the first lady wore a "Moschino sheath dress adorned with a fabric rosette at the right shoulder" together with a "diamond brooch by Garavelli", which was an anniversary gift from the president. No Trinidad newspaper comes even close to this "depth" of coverage.

But, is there a Louis Vuitton connection between the T&T PM and the American first lady? A fashion website says, "Supermodel Naomi Campbell has once voiced out her fondness with the Louis Vuitton line and is frequently photographed toting around an LV bag. Professional tennis player Anna Kournikova has also been spotted with an LV limited-edition bag while she was on her way to a party, and even First Lady Michelle Obama has a few Louis Vuitton handbags tucked away in her closet."

A Louis Vuitton bag also featured prominently in a matter involving another political figure - the former prime minister of Grenada, Dr Keith Mitchell. An article in a Trinidad newspaper in August 2007 stated that former T&T Attorney General Ramesh Maharaj was representing Dr Mitchell at a commission of enquiry headed by Dr Richard Cheltenham, investigating allegations made by a journalist in a 2004 Miami newsletter called Offshore Alert.

What's in the bag?

The newsletter claimed that Mitchell took a US$500,000 cash bribe from Eric Resteiner in a Louis Vuitton bag on a trip to Switzerland. Resteiner was made a diplomatic representative of Grenada to Switzerland. Dr Mitchell consistently denied receiving any bribe and maintained that he got US$15,000 as reimbursements. This prompted one critic to say that it is unusual for the receptacle to be worth more than the contents.

The fact that Vuitton has a 'joke' bag has added fuel to the controversy which died down during the carnival season and may be rekindled after Ash Wednesday. The bags are sold as "authentic Louis Vuitton Richard Prince Mancrazy" accessories.

Ashlee Simpson's cost about US$2,200 and another sold for US$3,995. Many of the jokes are from the king of one-liners, Henny Youngman. They include: "Every time I meet a girl who can cook like my mother, she looks like my father." "My wife went to the beauty shop and got a mud pack. For two days she looked beautiful. Then the mud feel off." "I've been married for 30 years and I'm still in love with the same woman. If my wife ever finds out, she'll kill me."

Speaking of bags, Youngman once quipped, "Getting on a plane, I told the ticket lady, 'Send one of my bags to New York, send one to Los Angeles, and send one to Miami.' She said, 'We can't do that!' I told her, 'You did it last week!'"

I suppose that given the designer preoccupation, a joke about the T&T PM's recent trip to India had to emerge. It is said that when the two PMs met, they spent a lot of time discussing the heavy weight of the offices they carried, their burdensome responsibilities, and all the many demands on their time.

The Indian PM, Dr Manmohan Singh, revealed that he was responsible for several ministries, including personnel, public grievances and pensions, as well as planning, atomic energy and space. He then turned to the T&T PM and asked, "And what is your portfolio?" She replied with a proud smile, "Louis Vuitton, of course."

Tony Deyal was last seen saying that it is ironic to find on a US$3,000 Louis Vuitton handbag the following one-liner, "My wife is always asking for money: $200 one day, $150 the next, $125 after that. "That's crazy," my friend said. "What does she do with it all?" "I don't know," I said. "I never gave her any."


ed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier Handbags

Louis Vuitton's International Tour Of Trademark Bullying Runs Smack Dab Into ... - Techdirt

Over the years, we've repeatedly identified Louis Vuitton as one of the biggest trademark bullies around. The company seeks to abuse trademark law to stifle free speech all the time. Anything involving any kind of parody of LV's trademark seems to get a cease and desist. A few examples: LV sued Hyundai because of a silly commercial which (very, very briefly) shows a basketball with a design kinda like the LV monogram pattern in an ad joking about what a more "luxury" world would look like. Even more troubling has been LV's decisions to go after artists commenting on consumerist culture. There was the successful move to shut down an art exhibit by a student who made locust sculptures out of counterfeit LV bags. Then, famously, LV went hard after artist Nadia Plesner who made some t-shirts to benefit victims of the genocide in Darfur. She had made some t-shirts showing a young Darfur victim carrying a bag that had a similar (but not exact) pattern to LV's bag pattern. In all of these cases, LV is clearly abusing both the intent and letter of trademark law to stifle commentary or parody, rather than any real confusion (or even dilution).

It's latest attempt really picked on the wrong target. It seems that students at the University of Pennsylvania's Law School were organizing their annual symposium on intellectual property issues in fashion and came up with the following invite/poster: As you can probably see, the top section of the image is a somewhat clever parody of LV's pattern, replacing segments with a stylized TM to match the stylized LV, and also a ? symbol. And.... LV freaks out. It sent a legal nastygram (pdf and embedded below) demanding the school and the student group cease-and-desist, arguing all sorts or ridiculousness, including arguing that this "infringement" (it's not) was "willful" because as a law school and law students, they should know better (they do -- which is why they know it's not infringing), and taking a particularly obnoxious scolding tone for someone so wrong:

This egregious action is not only a serious willful infringement and knowingly dilutes the LV Trademarks, but also may mislead others into thinking that this type of unlawful activity is somehow "legal" or constitutes "fair use" because the Penn Intellectual Property Group is sponsoring a seminar on fashion law and "must be experts." People seeing the invitation/poster may believe that Louis Vuitton either sponsored the seminar or was otherwise involved, and approved the misuse of its trademarks in this manner. I would have thought the Penn Intellectual Property Group, and its faculty advisors, would understand the basics of intellectual property law and know better than to infringe and dilute the famous trademarks of fashion brands, including the LV Trademarks, for a symposium on fashion law.
The thing is, almost everything that LV's lawyer argues above is wrong about the law -- and the "experts" at UPenn are right that this in no way infringes. Unfortunately, somehow LV's lawyer was able to first get a "communications" guy from the school on the phone who (without understanding any of this) agreed to back down and promised that the poster wouldn't be used. Thankfully, then the lawyers stepped up and said, "no way." A lawyer representing the school responded to LV's lawyer with a little lesson in trademark law (pdf and embedded below). Here's a snippet:
You assert that the clever artwork parody that appears on the poster and invitation is a "serious willful infringement." However, to constitute trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, PIPG has to be using a trademark in interstate commerce, which is substantially similar to Louis Vuitton's mark(s), and which is likely to cause confusion between Louis Vuitton's luxury apparel goods and PIPG's educational conference among the relevant audience. First, I don't believe that PIPG's artwork parody was adopted as, or is being used as, a trademark to identify any goods and services. It is artwork on a poster to supplement text, designed to evoke some of the very issues to be discussed at the conference, including the importance of intellectual property rights to fashion companies.... Second, although you don't cite the actual federal trademark registration that you assert protect your marks, I doubt any of them are registered in Class 41 to cover educational symposia in intellectual property law issues. There is no substantial similarity between the goods identified by Louis Vuitton's marks and the PIPG educational symposium. Third, there is no likelihood of confusion possible here. The lawyers, law students, and fashion industry executives who will attend the symposium certainly are unlikely to think that Louis Vuitton is organizing the conference; the poster clearly says that PIPG has organized the event, with support from Penn Law and a number of nationally-known law firms. The artwork on the poster and invitation does not constitute trademark infringement.

You also state that PIPG's use of its artwork parody knowingly dilutes the Louis Vuitton trademarks. I disagree. First, PIPG has not commenced use of the artwork as a mark or trade name, which is a prerequisite for any liability under 15 U.S.C. 1125(c)(1). More importantly, however, even if PIPG has used the artwork as a mark, there is an explicit exception to any liability for dilution by blurring or dilution by tarnishment for "any noncommercial use of a mark." 15 U.S.S. 1125(c)(3)(c). A law student group at a non-profit university promoting its annual educational symposium is a noncommercial use. Lastly, the artwork is clearly fair use....

There's a bit more in the response letter, including UPenn's lawyer inviting LV's lawyer to attend the event, and asking him to introduce himself. One would hope that LV's counsel will have the good sense to let this matter drop, but it would be kind of fun to see LV get smacked down in court for yet another case of trademark bullying.

61 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
ed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier Handbags

What ingredients are inside your name-brand cereal? - The Province (blog)

When I used to work in Kitsilano area of Vancouver, there was a woman who rode around on a Vespa that she had painted and upholstered in the traditional Louis Vuitton monogram. Now, I would like to think that this makes Monsieur Vuitton role over in his grave as the LV line was originally intended to be a classy and timeless look. Over the years, many people have hi-jacked brands and labels making them anything but. I am not innocent either. There was a time in my life where I bought and wore a (fake) Dolce & Gabbana monogrammed swimsuit, thought that (real) Coach monogram rain boots were cute, and bought and toted around my fair share of (fake) Louis Vuitton, Prada and Gucci bags. These days, I stick to timeless and classic totes. But that does not mean my days as a label w—- are over. I am just a different kind of s—.

This morning, I was looking at my two cereal options for breakfast. I have long been a lover of Special K. Especially the idea of their Special K challenge, which if followed you shed 6 lbs in two weeks. My other option was Crispy Rice by my new favourite brand, Nature’s Path. I looked at the calories to make my choice, but then hearing Jillian Michaels in my ear, remembered that it is NOT all about calories. Yes, they are important. But so is what you are putting in your body. So my eyes went south to the “Ingredients” list.

Nature’s Path Crispy Rice:

Organic brown rice flour, organic evaporated cane juice, sea salt, organic molasses.

Kellog’s Special K:

Rice, wheat gluten, sugar, defatted wheat germ, salt, HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP, dried whey, malt flavoring, calcium caseinate, ascorbic acid,alpha tocopherol acetate, reduded iron,niacinamide, pyridoxine hydrochloride, riboflavin,thiamin hydrochloride, vitamin A palmitate, folic acid, and vitamin B.

I am sorry. WHAT? I am no doctor, but if I can’t pronounce what I am eating, I don’t eat it. And why is there high fructose corn syrup in my supposed “diet” cereal? The thing about big brands and diets, is they make money off of tricking us. We eat this to lose weight, yet the HFCS is not going to help us with that. So we buy other diet products and the cycle never ends. As Louis Vuitton never intended his monogrammed bag to be made into fakes and toted around by a 14 year old (aka me circa 1998. God never intended us to enrich and destroy the natural super foods He gave to us. If we stuck to eating God’s food, we would be a fit and healthier people. But somewhere along the way, we all just bought into the lies of the food industry. It makes me quite angry, really. I really encourage anyone who is interested in learning more about eating a cleaner diet to pick up any book by Micheal Pollan, the “Eat Clean Diet” by Tosca Reno (a fellow Canadian, and “Master Your Metabolism,” by Jillian Michaels.

Years of putting bad crap in my body can be undone. It is not going to be easy, but nothing worth doing ever is, right?

Have a happy and healthy day!


ed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier Handbags

2012年3月20日星期二

The mysteries of brand worship - New Straits Times


When my wife? told me that it was a hot favourite among teenagers, including my daughter and her schoolmates, I decided to find out more.

When I was at a shopping complex recently, and had? time on my hands, I? popped into a bag shop and asked for a Long Cheng. The 70-something Ah Pek who was keeping watch at the shop at lunch time was as perplexed as I was. He said the shop sold all sorts of bags from China but he had never heard of a Long Cheng.

The mystery was solved when the Filipina shop assistant came back from? lunch. The name? struck a chord with her. The mysterious Long Cheng, it turns out, is? actually the? Longchamp. Since they did not carry the brand she directed me to another shop.

According to the Wikipedia, Longchamp was set up by Frenchman Jean Cassegrain in 1948. The? company? produced leather coverings for pipes and other products for smokers.

In the 1950s, its business expanded to include small leather goods.

Two decades later, Longchamp opened boutiques in Hong Kong and Japan, and won fame for its lightweight travel goods. In the mid-90s, Longchamp introduced its Le Pliage line of foldable travel bags made of vinyl and leather trim which became a hit with women worldwide.

Today,? Longchamp is known for its designs and has a loyal following. As to? how it came to our shores, your guess is as good as mine, but the blogs of Longchamp diehards will give you some idea why this foldable bag is hugely popular.

I remember a time when we had a similar love affair with another French brand -- Louis Vuitton. In the 1970s and mid-1980s ownership of?? the dark brown designer leather bags, wallets and travel luggage imprinted with the golden LV insignia meant? you had arrived.

Those who? could only afford? across-the-border excursions? made do with LV wannabes.

I recall finding a very genuine-looking wannabe LV bag once. It could have fooled anyone if not for the LW imprint. When I asked the? chap who sold the stuff in Petaling Street what the imprint LW stood for, he said: "Looi Wui-tong -- from Seri Kembangan."

In the case of the Longchamp, an authentic bag costs anything from RM300 upwards.? Even wannabes don't come cheap.

I am no expert in Longchamps but the look-alikes I have seen appear to be convincing enough to fool just about anybody but devoted? brand worshippers.

I hope those totting? the fake ones? do not attract more than just brand-envy.


ed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier Handbags

Louis Vuitton 'Epi Is Magic' Campaign 2012 - becomegorgeous.com

Epi leather was one of the greatest innovations of the 80s. Designers considered it as the ultimate symbol of extravagance and urbane glamor. In order to pay a tribute to the cult of this amazing material the Louis Vuitton atelier created a selection of fabulous handbags drenched in vivid and attention-grabbing hues. The couture house asked French heiress Claire Courtin-Clarins to act out the role of a modern trendsetter in the Louis Vuitton 'Epi Is Magic' campaign.

The young IT girl had no difficulties popularizing the latest handbags and satchel designs along with fabulous and colorful wallets. Fabrice Laffont is the mastermind behind the photoshoot and the ideal settings selected to breathe life into this lookbook were obviously the streets of Paris. Thanks to the creativity and originality of the photographer, we have a fabulous parade of images which offer center stage to accessories and present the model and the scene in black and white.

To the greatest delight of LV girls, style fans have the chance to spot the classic Tricolore Noe, the Alma and the Petit Noe. The limited-edition bags come in a variety of statement shades. The chromatic palette features: cacao, cyan canard, citron, fuchsia, cool gray, menthe, prune and classy black. Using a fabulous color palette is the secret weapon to turn these 'oldies but goldies' accessories into modern and on trend wardrobe staples.

Put your best fashion foot forward by complementing your outfits with high street handbags sculpted in different shapes and armed up with an 'it' color. The complete collection includes a set of voguish wallets like the Zippy and the Sarah wallet along with chic card holders. The LV brand was and will always be a real fashion force in this modern industry. Celebrities and trendsetters will have the chance to inject a vitality boost into their signature outfits with the help of the latest 'Epi Is Magic' pouch collection.


ed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier Handbags

Will Louis Vuitton Temporarily Relocate Its Fifth Avenue Flagship? - Racked NY (blog)

× Like us and you'll find top breaking news in your Facebook newsfeed. Sign up for our daily email newsletter and get top stories and breaking news delivered to your inbox. Friday, March 16, 2012, by Tiffany Yannetta

2012_03_Louis-Vuitton-Fifth-Avenue.jpg
Image via Frendy Says

The massive Louis Vuitton flagship at 1 East 57th Street and Fifth Avenue might need to temporarily relocate itself while its under renovation, and The Real Deal thinks it knows where. Enter 3 West 57th Street, which has been home to temporary locations of high-end retailers such as Chanel, Bulgari, and Salvatore Ferragamo, while their permanent locations are busy getting facelifts.

Louis Vuitton recently bought up its neighboring building at 743 Fifth Avenue, and plans to demolish it and expand it into its larger space. Since there can't be any dust and debris flying around the LV bags, the store "will need to relocate at least some of its retail to 3 West 57th Street," according to sources. Meanwhile, 3 West 57th Street is pretty proud of its fancy tenants. Adam Brodsky, director of commercial properties for the building's owner, Hakim Organization, explains: "We really do have a little niche." Or, the high-end brands are the only ones willing to shell out up to $450,000 a month for something so fleeting.
· Louis Vuitton may be next for Fifth Avenue’s luxury pop-up locale [TRD]
· Louis Vuitton Will Be Expanding Its 57th Street Store [Racked NY]

1 East 57th Street New York NY
ed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier Handbags

Lessons from a celebrity rehab clinic - Salon

This article originally appeared on The Fix.

the fixI’d been sober a little over a year when I got the job. That was the minimum requirement: You had to at least have a year clean if they were going to hire you. I had achieved a year clean off IV crystal meth and heroin, and I saw the job at the posh rehab in Malibu as basically the best opportunity I was gonna get. After all I was just 21 at the time — a college dropout who’d already been in and out of four different rehab programs. My last job had been working at the juice bar of a funky, not-too-clean health food store in one of the sketchiest neighborhoods in L.A. They’d paid me whatever minimum wage was back in the early 2000s and, believe me, it wasn’t enough.

But the chichi treatment center in the Malibu hills promised to pay more than twice that salary, and, besides, it would afford me a certain kind of cachet — one lacking in the kitchen of the health food store I had recently abandoned. I mean, I was gonna be working at this rehab full of celebrities. That was something I could tell people with pride when they ask the first question everyone always asks in L.A., “So, what do you do?”

“I’m a Residential Technician at **** in Malibu,” I could say.

Well, at least it sounded cool.

In terms of what a “Residential Technician” actually did, if anything it was more like being a glorified baby sitter. You had to keep tabs on all the clients at all times, search their rooms and their persons, get ‘em to pee in cups for you, pass out medication, drive ‘em around to the gym or 12-step meetings, and, because these are the rich and famous we’re talking about, basically do whatever it is they ask.

I’d been to different county and hospital and low-end private places that seemed to operate on the philosophy that you had to be broken down before you could be built back up: There were always countless chores to be done, rules to follow, and punishments to be doled out.

But not so at ****, a tony facility nestled in Malibu that charged upward of $50,000 for a 28-day stay. For that kind of money, patients were understandably reluctant to do chores — or anything else they didn’t want to do. We did the chores for them. And as far as the rules went — well, they were really more like suggestions. There were no punishments. No one had to make their own bed or respect time limits on the phone or even cancel any appointments they had in the outside world. If some strung-out actor had a meeting with their agent — well, it was our job to drive ‘em there. If they wanted to barge into the office and use one of the counselor’s computers to check the security cameras at their house ‘cause they were convinced someone was breaking in, we had to let them do that, too. Basically, we weren’t allowed to ever say no to them. And, honestly, after a few months of working there, I was beginning to wonder if the whole thing wasn’t just some sort of scam — more like a resort with bonus clemency than a place where people actually learn how to change and face their feelings of self-hatred and inadequacy.

Because, in my mind, that’s what addiction really is — people trying to blot out the pain of being human with chemicals that inevitably just make the pain even worse. And what group of people as a whole could possibly be more insecure and hate themselves more than a bunch of actors and trust-fund kids? Both my parents were celebrity journalists, so believe me when I tell you that most actors live for attention and external ego stroking. And most trust-fund sons or daughters are constantly in need of validation that they are good enough and that people like them — really like them! — for who they are. Because how could they ever know? If you’re the child of a celebrity, how could you ever have confidence that the girl or guy you’re dating is with you for who you are or for who your parent is — and the access they get by proxy to fame and privilege? Believe me, these are some seriously fucked-up people. And that’s coming from the perspective of a seriously fucked-up person.

Addiction is like an epidemic among those people, so a lifestyles of the rich and famous rehab would inevitably be a goldmine. That’s especially true in this day and age when a stint in rehab is touted as the answer to everyone’s problems — as if a 30-day treatment center could erase a lifetime of bad decisions. From cheating on your wife to erupting in a racist tirade, rehab seems to be the quick fix every disgraced celebrity is looking for. And if you’ve got to go to rehab, a place like this up on the hill in Malibu is definitely the way to go. With five-star chefs, tennis courts, equine therapy, a swimming pool, and a staff of friendly Residential Technicians just like me on hand to do your every bidding — well, rehab doesn’t have to be much different from a month at the Beverly Hills Hotel. And while working there, I couldn’t help wondering if I was actually doing more harm than good.

As I said, at every rehab I ever went to, there was a strict set of rules and guidelines you had to follow, all in the name of trying to foster some sort of humility in a bunch of selfish, self-centered drug addicts and alcoholics. And for me, honestly, it really did work. Having to do chores, being told no, and being stripped of my freedom definitely made an impression. But the rich and famous clients at this place didn’t get any of that. One time, this actor guy from an HBO series stuck a piece of pizza crust from that night’s dinner into the lock of the med room door and when the tech on duty went back up there 10 minutes later, the actor had broken in and was riffling greedily through the many bottles of painkillers and anti-anxiety medications.

Now, at any rehab I went to, an act like that would’ve had me out on the street in a second, but not so here. The philosophy was, I suppose, that rich and famous people are used to a certain kind of treatment and, if they don’t get it, they will simply leave. That’s why the goal, above all else, was to just get them to stay. They could be detoxing so bad off alcohol that their whole body was going through seizures, but if they wanted their dry cleaning taken care of, one of us had to run right out and make sure it got done — and that the cleaners didn’t use too much starch. One ex-”Saturday Night Live” comedian made me drive him to a meeting with a director at the Grill in Beverly Hills, but because all the nice cars were taken, I had to take him in my tiny red-tin-can, oil-leaking Mazda 323, and he made me drop him off three blocks away so no one would see him arriving in such a déclassé little vehicle. And, of course, when some actor guy from a TV show way before my time overflowed the toilet, guess who had to wade into the bathroom to clean his mess up?

At any rehab I went to, special requests were automatically denied and any chance for humiliation was considered character building and good for recovery. And it was true. As an addict, I was a self-entitled bastard. Being in rehab and having to scrub the toilets and follow the rules really did help bring me down to size. But the clients here weren’t getting that. I actually felt sorry for them — like they were being taken advantage of and throwing away their $50,000.

But, on the other hand, I have to admit, I found myself getting kind of jealous, too. I mean, there I was, over a year sober, supposedly doing everything right, and yet I was the one having to take out some adult trust fund kid’s dry cleaning, eating the clients’ leftovers only after they were at least one day old. I was the one making their beds and driving them out to go see Lakers games. Once, one of the clients offered me $10,000 to give him one Klonopin. I refused but — I mean, I’d never had more than $2,000 in my bank account in my entire life. Honestly, being humble and sober didn’t seem anywhere near as much fun as being rich and in rehab. And I wasn’t the only staff member who seemed to be getting a little star-struck and envious. Other techs and even counselors would gossip about the clients in hush-hush terms every chance they got. We all knew who was worth what and where their money came from, and we spread rumors about impending intakes.

“Did you hear Britney Spears is checking in tomorrow?” I was told about 10 times over the course of working there (though, in truth, she never came at all).

Even the head of the entire program got into the action, saying to a woman just coming in with a collection of Louis Vuitton luggage, “Oh, perfect, wait here. I’ll get my LV bags and bring them in to keep your LV bags company.”

And then she actually did.

Of course, we all tried to play it down, going on and on to each other about how hard it must be for the clients, never knowing whether people actually liked them for who they were or because of their famous names and money. We pitied the trust fund kids because they’d never be able to emerge in their own light from the shadows left behind by their more successful parents. We told ourselves they’d never get sober, being pampered the way we were instructed to pamper them. We laughed when they complained about the food the five-star chef had prepared for them. We were more than happy to eat the leftovers as we shared stories about the awful steamed hospital mush we’d had to eat in our county detoxes and sober livings.

And we, the techs, did try to band together. We used to secretly trade the expensive coffee we were supposed to serve the clients with the cheap Folgers in a can coffee we were supposed to brew in the staff room. So we’d be drinking high-end coffee from some small batch roaster in Venice while they drank bulk supermarket coffee; more often than not, they’d compliment us on how good it tasted.

At night, when we were alone in the office, we’d read the clients’ different case files — especially the six-page questionnaire they had to fill out when they arrived. We’d laugh at how out of touch their answers were. Like when the trust fund kids would write that they identified their “main problem” as being that the executers of their family’s estate were too uptight and wouldn’t give them enough money. I remember one woman (who wasn’t a kid anymore, by any means, but was, nonetheless, still a trust fund kid), who insisted that her lawyers and executers came to the family group on Sunday so we could convince them to give her more money.

Oh, man, and those Sunday family groups really were something else. It was like a “Who’s Who” of Hollywood elite all sitting around in plastic folding chairs trying to figure out why their son or daughter or brother or sister or husband or wife had been throwing away their lives on drugs and alcohol. And we all laughed at that, too. Because it seemed so obvious. They were these huge celebrities who’d all had their fucked-up personal lives splashed across the pages of glossy grocery-store gossip magazines. We knew that the couple there with the teenage daughter in rehab were both on their third marriage and probably so preoccupied with their own careers that the poor girl never had a chance. We told ourselves that we pitied her.

We told ourselves that we pitied them all.

But secretly, I mean, deep down, I’m pretty sure we all would have given just about anything to trade places with them. That HBO actor guy who stole all the meds was so sick during his opiate detox, we had to hold him sitting up just so he could go to the bathroom. In a delirium, he broke into one of the “druggie buggies” (a fleet of Yukon XLs) and attempted to drive it through the locked gates. He was sick and rambling incoherently. But, still, it’s not like he ever had any consequences for his behavior. If anything, we just had to coddle him more after a scene like that — afterward, a bunch of us had to stay with him literally 24 hours a day. And when his girlfriend (another famous actor) came to visit, the staff was more concerned with asking her to reenact a scene from her famous movie than in telling her what her boyfriend (and the father of her child) had been up to.

So, yeah, not only did I watch them let him get away with absolutely anything, but I also knew damn well that at the end of the 30 days, that guy had his hot celebrity girlfriend to go back to and a house in Malibu and an action movie to promote that spring. And me? Well, I had my Mazda 323, a $400-a-month room in an apartment with an old man permanently fixed to a caving-in chair in front of a boxy old TV set that only got around 30-something channels. I was living paycheck to paycheck, working over 40 hours a week, and having to pick out cigarette butts from the planters around the rehab’s main house.

Honestly, however bad these rich folk had it, I gotta say, they didn’t really seem to have it that bad. And, besides, there was something glamorous about their self-destructiveness — something far more glamorous than what I’d thought would be my glamorous job working there. And, anyway, I hadn’t signed on to be the personal assistant to 20 or more spoiled rich people in the throes of chemical dependency. I’d thought I’d be working to help them, but after a few months, I was beginning to feel like we were just making things worse — both for ourselves and for the clients. What they needed from us was to tell them no. But, as it turned out, our jobs were just to add to their entourage of servile, sycophantic flatterers. We were like those plastic surgeons that continued to operate on Michael Jackson when it was obvious he’d already gone way too far. And, honestly, it came to wear on me pretty damn thin. I don’t have the figures or expertise to say how successful a treatment center like that one is at rehabbing its clients. All I know is that, for me, the environment grew to be about as toxic as they come. Living in LA is already a slippery slope to be negotiating for anyone trying to retain some form of sanity. But working there definitely pushed me right over the edge. Our collective idol worship brought me to dating an actress — the closest thing to a celebrity I could find — and the two us spent about six months shooting dope in her one-bedroom apartment in the Hollywood Hills. I lost my job, of course — or more like just stopped showing up — and found myself back in rehab again, but this time as a patient. And though the place I checked into wasn’t anything fancy, they definitely told me no a whole lot. They broke me down to build me up. And, honestly, I was grateful. Because I’d seen the other side. And for me, what can I say? It just didn’t work.


ed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier Handbags

2012年3月15日星期四

Louis Vuitton exhibit: It's the bag, stupid - CBS News

(AP) PARIS - "Fashions fade, style is eternal," Yves Saint Laurent once said.

An immutable fashion list must include the Ls Vuitton bag, on display demurely but proudly in Paris' Decorative Arts Museum like the historical artifact it should be.

The bag pattern was first patented in 1877 but it can still be seen — almost unchanged — on the Parisian boulevards more than 130 years later. This is thanks to house founder Louis Vuitton, and since 1997, creative director Marc Jacobs.

Both their stories are woven together in a colorful exhibit that spans over a century of fashion history.

The exhibit takes the visitor from the founder's humble beginnings as a case-packer to the fantastical runway shows that transformed the house into one of the world's biggest names, with a revenue last year of euro2.5 billion. Though both men are from different centuries, the exhibition asks whether they have more in common than meets the eye.

There's a small clue in the first room: portraits of the two men hang side by side, both sporting mustaches in the style of their age.

"They're both visionaries, though they would be the last to admit it," said museum curator Pamela Golbin, "and they both lived an exact same story at a decisive moment in fashion."

Louis Vuitton faced industrialization of the 19th century and new train travel while Marc Jacobs was confronted with 1990s' changing demands for marketing "making fashion truly globalized for the first time," Golbin said.

The story began for Louis Vuitton as a trunk-packer for rich Parisians, a job in which he was able to hone a mastery of every bolt, lock and corner of travel cases from across the French capital. He built on his knowledge, finally opening his own house in 1854.

The Orient Express was new and fashionable, and the meteoric rise of haute couture under Charles Frederic Worth meant better-dressed women went on trips with more and more clothes — that needed cases to fit them in.

Such was the demand that the norm in the late-19th century norm, as one display shows, was for a traveling lady to take a staggering 30 large cases on each trip.

From this a thousand trunks were born, all perfectly preserved with their original wax coatings and all viewable at the exhibit: hat trunks, toiletries trunks, trunks that pulled out as a chest of drawers, metal trunks for humid countries. For the trendy yet tired, there was a trunk that folded out into a bed.

As it still does under Jacobs, the house had a sense for the avant-garde as early as 1890: one gargantuan case boasts the title the "Never Full Bag."

Then there was the radical facelift of the 1990s. Glossy fashion magazines landed and globalized demands meant that labels had to up their game and expand, or sink. Creative talent was no longer the only criteria sought by the industry: instead "marketing" became the buzz word.

Enter Marc Jacobs, already a big name in the fashion industry, to design the Louis Vuitton house's first ready-to-wear collection, 143 bag-filled years later.

Using his corporate knowledge and irreverent humor he revamped the bags and shoes — the company's financial lifeline.

A vivid display of mannequins kneeling captures the transformation from past to present perfectly: each model has a classic Louis Vuitton bag placed on her back — covered in graffiti.

The exhibit shows other irreverent sources of musings for the designer, including a 2003 manga film by Japanese artist Takashi Murakami that is used to revamp the traditional LV monogram.

The continued growth of the house comes down to his versatility.

Marc Jacobs fall-winter runway show featured models in Edwardian hats exiting a reconstructed train that might have been the turn-of-the-century Orient Express. So there we have it, the full circle.

But, the designer mused backstage, "Whatever you try, clothes never really can live in the past. They are worn now so they are modern, with a modern take. I'm not nostalgic."

The exhibit "Louis Vuitton-Marc Jacobs" runs March 9-Sept. 16.


ed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier Handbags

2012年3月14日星期三

Louis Vuitton exhibit: It's the bag, stupid - Boston.com

Louis Vuitton exhibit: It’s the bag, stupid - Boston.com HOME/COLLECTIONS/FASHIONLouis Vuitton exhibit: It’s the bag, stupidMarch 09, 2012|Thomas Adamson, Associated PressShareE-mailPrint

“Fashions fade, style is eternal,’’ Yves Saint Laurent once said.

An immutable fashion list must include the Ls Vuitton bag, on display demurely but proudly in Paris’ Decorative Arts Museum like the historical artifact it should be.

The bag pattern was first patented in 1877 but it can still be seen — almost unchanged — on the Parisian boulevards more than 130 years later. This is thanks to house founder Louis Vuitton, and since 1997, creative director Marc Jacobs.

Both their stories are woven together in a colorful exhibit that spans over a century of fashion history.

The exhibit takes the visitor from the founder’s humble beginnings as a case-packer to the fantastical runway shows that transformed the house into one of the world’s biggest names, with a revenue last year of euro2.5 billion. Though both men are from different centuries, the exhibition asks whether they have more in common than meets the eye.

There’s a small clue in the first room: portraits of the two men hang side by side, both sporting mustaches in the style of their age.

“They’re both visionaries, though they would be the last to admit it,’’ said museum curator Pamela Golbin, “and they both lived an exact same story at a decisive moment in fashion.’’

Louis Vuitton faced industrialization of the 19th century and new train travel while Marc Jacobs was confronted with 1990s’ changing demands for marketing “making fashion truly globalized for the first time,’’ Golbin said.

The story began for Louis Vuitton as a trunk-packer for rich Parisians, a job in which he was able to hone a mastery of every bolt, lock and corner of travel cases from across the French capital. He built on his knowledge, finally opening his own house in 1854.

The Orient Express was new and fashionable, and the meteoric rise of haute couture under Charles Frederic Worth meant better-dressed women went on trips with more and more clothes — that needed cases to fit them in.

Such was the demand that the norm in the late-19th century norm, as one display shows, was for a traveling lady to take a staggering 30 large cases on each trip.

From this a thousand trunks were born, all perfectly preserved with their original wax coatings and all viewable at the exhibit: hat trunks, toiletries trunks, trunks that pulled out as a chest of drawers, metal trunks for humid countries. For the trendy yet tired, there was a trunk that folded out into a bed.

As it still does under Jacobs, the house had a sense for the avant-garde as early as 1890: one gargantuan case boasts the title the “Never Full Bag.’’

12Next?AdvertisementMORE LIKE THIS ?Fashion industry prepares lovefest for Marc Jacobs
June 3, 2011NY Fashion Week: Wearable, sellable looks for fall
February 9, 2012Choo-choo chic at Louis Vuitton retro show
March 7, 2012FIND MORE STORIES ABOUT ?FashionAdvertisement? 2012 NY Times Co.Your Ad Choices|Privacy Policy|Contact Boston.com|Index by Date|Index by Keyword
ed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier Handbags

2012年3月10日星期六

Louis Vuitton and Marc Jacob Exhibition Gets Surprise Visit from Kristen ... - Gather Celebs News Channel

After the drama of the Louis Vuitton fashion show today, that theme continued later at the label's, "Les Art Decoratifs," exhibition, held to celebrate the work, history, and relationship of the power fashion house and its creative designer, Marc Jacobs. Earlier, a navy, "orient express" train entrance kicked off the fun at the start of LV/MJ fashion show, to the sound of cheers from a wowed audience. And the show itself, "old world" luxurious long coats, skirts and fashion forward dresses with a mix of bejewelled, leather bags (carried by porters, naturally), didn't disappoint either.

Amazing train entrance at the LV/MJ show. Source: fashiontelegraph.co.uk Courtesy of Reuters

After the show, things got even more fabulous when uber-couple Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson showed up at the LV/MJ exhibition later that same evening. Kristen, rocking a short, body-hugging, black leopard dress by the label and white, detailed heels, was accompanied by a casually dressed Robert, wearing a baseball cap (well he wasn't working), and Kristen's publicist Ruth Bernstein. Of course, it's perhaps not so shocking the loved-up couple were there seeing as they did visit the LV showroom earlier this week, but it was still a surprise to many—judging by the reaction on the Internet.

imagebam.com

Word of the couple's arrival at the exhibition came via numerous fashion journalists on Twitter. Courtney Justice tweeted, "Kristen Stewart just arrived at the Louis Vuitton - Marc Jacobs exhibition opening tonight!#PFW", then seconds later added, "Rob looks good. #JustSayin." James Myers from Digital News Agency, tweeted, "standing in a room w/ Gwyneth, SJP, R-Pats and Kristen Stewart, Diana Aggron, Marc Jacobs," and stylist, Mandy Merheb tweeted, "spotted Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart walking hand in hand to the Marc Jacobs Louis Vuittion exhibition" - along with a picture of the couple.

pic.twitter.com/d8K0688q

The high fashion event was also quite the celebrity coup. Joining Robert and Kristen at the star-packed exhibition were Charlotte Gainsbourg, actress Sarah Jessica Parker, Brit singer Corinne Bailey Rae, socialite and model Poppy Delevigne, and oh, Karl Lagerfield. Just an average Wednesday night in Paris then.

On a trip that saw Kristen and Robert take in a meet with Paul McCartney and dinner with friends from On The Road, their appearance at the place to be tonight comes at the close of a spectacular Paris Fashion Week. It seems the City of Light and love delivered exactly that—and then some. Kristen can be seen in the clip below, and if you can spot Robert, your eyesight's fantastic!

Please provide details below to help Gather review this content. If it is found to be inappropriate and in violation of the Gather Terms of Service, action will be taken.Please select the part of the post you are reporting.Please select why you are reporting this content.Please enter a description.
ed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier Handbags

2012年3月9日星期五

Ultimate Guide to Louis Vuitton Bags for Men - AMOG

Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.
ed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier Handbags

Louis Vuitton 'Epi Is Magic' Campaign 2012 - becomegorgeous.com

Epi leather was one of the greatest innovations of the 80s. Designers considered it as the ultimate symbol of extravagance and urbane glamor. In order to pay a tribute to the cult of this amazing material the Louis Vuitton atelier created a selection of fabulous handbags drenched in vivid and attention-grabbing hues. The couture house asked French heiress Claire Courtin-Clarins to act out the role of a modern trendsetter in the Louis Vuitton 'Epi Is Magic' campaign.

The young IT girl had no difficulties popularizing the latest handbags and satchel designs along with fabulous and colorful wallets. Fabrice Laffont is the mastermind behind the photoshoot and the ideal settings selected to breathe life into this lookbook were obviously the streets of Paris. Thanks to the creativity and originality of the photographer, we have a fabulous parade of images which offer center stage to accessories and present the model and the scene in black and white.

To the greatest delight of LV girls, style fans have the chance to spot the classic Tricolore Noe, the Alma and the Petit Noe. The limited-edition bags come in a variety of statement shades. The chromatic palette features: cacao, cyan canard, citron, fuchsia, cool gray, menthe, prune and classy black. Using a fabulous color palette is the secret weapon to turn these 'oldies but goldies' accessories into modern and on trend wardrobe staples.

Put your best fashion foot forward by complementing your outfits with high street handbags sculpted in different shapes and armed up with an 'it' color. The complete collection includes a set of voguish wallets like the Zippy and the Sarah wallet along with chic card holders. The LV brand was and will always be a real fashion force in this modern industry. Celebrities and trendsetters will have the chance to inject a vitality boost into their signature outfits with the help of the latest 'Epi Is Magic' pouch collection.


ed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier Handbags

All Aboard the LV Express - New York Times

But there the relationship between the show dreamed up by the designer Marc Jacobs for the final day of Paris Fashion Week and the reality of four on-the-road weeks for the fashion crowd came to a grinding halt.

These travelers were gorgeous in their journey attire and its extraordinary adornment of brocades and jacquards, embroidered with baubles or appliquéd with glimmering, reflective hologram-like forms.

Wouldn’t all that stuff get caught up in a suitcase’s wheels? No problem! Uniformed porters carried the bags, which ranged from classic LV Monogram canvas trimmed with crocodile to furry totes. For hand luggage, the designer was thinking big and, for once, he brought the best-selling accessories into a parallel universe with the clothes.

Even if Mr. Jacobs was not directly inspired by the exhibition that opens Friday at the Musée des Arts Décoratifs in Paris — “Louis Vuitton Marc Jacobs,” dedicated to the house’s founder and the current designer — he took a visual trip in this winter 2012 collection.

“There is always an inspiration of travel at Vuitton,” said Yves Carcelle, the outgoing chief executive who has done so much over two decades to shape Vuitton from handbag and travel trunks to high fashion.

Backstage, Mr. Jacobs, wearing a Comme des Gar?ons black jersey dress rather than his usual kilt, extolled the merits of Vuitton’s new layered look over pants. With Prada, Chanel and Marc Jacobs’s U.S. brand walking the same track (and with Prada’s embellished coats singing the same tune as Vuitton’s), this layered look has to be taken as a major trend.

Although Mr. Jacobs admitted that the only train he ever stepped into was Eurostar, he caught the travel bug in two ways: the outerwear was exceptional in its A-line cut, which gave shapely space to the body; and he included inspiration from far-flung places, including metallic weaves replicating Afghan blankets.

The idea of intense and modern decoration, taking out the preciousness by using sparkling tinsel and glass “jewels,” like for children, is another trend from Mr. Jacobs, who greeted guests like the actresses Fan Bing Bing, of China, and Sarah Jessica Parker on the Vuitton train. It might have been Old World travel but for the international set, those clothes will fly.

Petal power

Nature sweet in leaf and bud was the story at the Alexander McQueen collection, where the savage rawness of the late designer was expressed with a gentler, organic spirit by Sarah Burton.

“I wanted it to be futuristic — but in a beautiful way, looking forward positively,” said the designer, whose expression of flowers budding and breaking made a mesmerizing and beautiful collection.

The explosion of petals, turning women into flowers, and the final array of floral abundance and vivid red and pink color was matched by exquisite handcraft. This house might even consider showing a collection of such craftsmanship in the haute couture season for there was no pretence here of a modern wardrobe — even one for such a rarefied fan as the Duchess of Cambridge, England’s some-day Queen. But with the McQ affordable line on stage in London, this brand is aiming for the fashion pinnacle.

What Ms. Burton called “exploding proportions” started as densely crafted pieces, but with the shape of a skirt more like a bud than a flower. Then floral patterns were laser cut, like paper doilies, into leather, while cherry blossom jacquards were enveloped by fluffy dandelion heads created from mink or feathers.

Silver belts in sculpted floral shapes reined in the abundance, while an air of mystery was provided by the models’ metallic blinders (fitting with the shoes, which were furry and heel-less, like horses’ hoofs).

The idea of beauty growing organically and bursting into flower was a fine symbol for the designer, who, after the traumatic departure of her boss and mentor, is now in full creative bloom.

Last minute

On the last day, and at almost the final moment of the international collections, Muiccia Prada made her 11th-hour fashion innovation: “Let there be pantsuits again!”


ed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier Handbags

The Doctor is in with the Louis Vuitton Brea GM Laptop Bag - Chip Chick

LV brea 572x489 The Doctor is in with the Louis Vuitton Brea GM Laptop Bag

The Louis Vuitton Brea GM is one of those bags that women drool over. Not because it’s a Louis Vuitton, simply gorgeous and has a $2,410 price tag. It’s because the bag serves two purposes showing off how completely shallow you are but also can hold not only a lipstick but an iPad or a small laptop.

That means you can show off how your style is inspired by the Housewives of Atlanta, Orange County, Beverly Hills, etc…but also keep grounded with the fact it? can hold your tech accessories without looking like a bulky carrying case. The Brea GM is inspired by the the doctor’s bag of yesteryear and aren’t we all walking tech doctors now with apps and technology at our fingertips?

LV Brea GM 572x423 The Doctor is in with the Louis Vuitton Brea GM Laptop Bag

The Brea GM features the classic LV Monogram design on a Vernis leather. It measures a 15.35 x 10.63 x5.91, has trimmings in natural cowhide, adjustable straps, two interior pockets, and one zippered pocket. So the bag may cost more than the stuff you got inside of it, but it is sooo worth it.


ed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier Handbags

PEOPLE v. SOUFFRANT - Leagle.com

Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.
ed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier Handbags

The mysteries of brand worship - New Straits Times


When my wife? told me that it was a hot favourite among teenagers, including my daughter and her schoolmates, I decided to find out more.

When I was at a shopping complex recently, and had? time on my hands, I? popped into a bag shop and asked for a Long Cheng. The 70-something Ah Pek who was keeping watch at the shop at lunch time was as perplexed as I was. He said the shop sold all sorts of bags from China but he had never heard of a Long Cheng.

The mystery was solved when the Filipina shop assistant came back from? lunch. The name? struck a chord with her. The mysterious Long Cheng, it turns out, is? actually the? Longchamp. Since they did not carry the brand she directed me to another shop.

According to the Wikipedia, Longchamp was set up by Frenchman Jean Cassegrain in 1948. The? company? produced leather coverings for pipes and other products for smokers.

In the 1950s, its business expanded to include small leather goods.

Two decades later, Longchamp opened boutiques in Hong Kong and Japan, and won fame for its lightweight travel goods. In the mid-90s, Longchamp introduced its Le Pliage line of foldable travel bags made of vinyl and leather trim which became a hit with women worldwide.

Today,? Longchamp is known for its designs and has a loyal following. As to? how it came to our shores, your guess is as good as mine, but the blogs of Longchamp diehards will give you some idea why this foldable bag is hugely popular.

I remember a time when we had a similar love affair with another French brand -- Louis Vuitton. In the 1970s and mid-1980s ownership of?? the dark brown designer leather bags, wallets and travel luggage imprinted with the golden LV insignia meant? you had arrived.

Those who? could only afford? across-the-border excursions? made do with LV wannabes.

I recall finding a very genuine-looking wannabe LV bag once. It could have fooled anyone if not for the LW imprint. When I asked the? chap who sold the stuff in Petaling Street what the imprint LW stood for, he said: "Looi Wui-tong -- from Seri Kembangan."

In the case of the Longchamp, an authentic bag costs anything from RM300 upwards.? Even wannabes don't come cheap.

I am no expert in Longchamps but the look-alikes I have seen appear to be convincing enough to fool just about anybody but devoted? brand worshippers.

I hope those totting? the fake ones? do not attract more than just brand-envy.


ed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier Handbags

2012年3月8日星期四

Louis Vuitton's International Tour Of Trademark Bullying Runs Smack Dab Into ... - Techdirt

Over the years, we've repeatedly identified Louis Vuitton as one of the biggest trademark bullies around. The company seeks to abuse trademark law to stifle free speech all the time. Anything involving any kind of parody of LV's trademark seems to get a cease and desist. A few examples: LV sued Hyundai because of a silly commercial which (very, very briefly) shows a basketball with a design kinda like the LV monogram pattern in an ad joking about what a more "luxury" world would look like. Even more troubling has been LV's decisions to go after artists commenting on consumerist culture. There was the successful move to shut down an art exhibit by a student who made locust sculptures out of counterfeit LV bags. Then, famously, LV went hard after artist Nadia Plesner who made some t-shirts to benefit victims of the genocide in Darfur. She had made some t-shirts showing a young Darfur victim carrying a bag that had a similar (but not exact) pattern to LV's bag pattern. In all of these cases, LV is clearly abusing both the intent and letter of trademark law to stifle commentary or parody, rather than any real confusion (or even dilution).

It's latest attempt really picked on the wrong target. It seems that students at the University of Pennsylvania's Law School were organizing their annual symposium on intellectual property issues in fashion and came up with the following invite/poster: As you can probably see, the top section of the image is a somewhat clever parody of LV's pattern, replacing segments with a stylized TM to match the stylized LV, and also a ? symbol. And.... LV freaks out. It sent a legal nastygram (pdf and embedded below) demanding the school and the student group cease-and-desist, arguing all sorts or ridiculousness, including arguing that this "infringement" (it's not) was "willful" because as a law school and law students, they should know better (they do -- which is why they know it's not infringing), and taking a particularly obnoxious scolding tone for someone so wrong:

This egregious action is not only a serious willful infringement and knowingly dilutes the LV Trademarks, but also may mislead others into thinking that this type of unlawful activity is somehow "legal" or constitutes "fair use" because the Penn Intellectual Property Group is sponsoring a seminar on fashion law and "must be experts." People seeing the invitation/poster may believe that Louis Vuitton either sponsored the seminar or was otherwise involved, and approved the misuse of its trademarks in this manner. I would have thought the Penn Intellectual Property Group, and its faculty advisors, would understand the basics of intellectual property law and know better than to infringe and dilute the famous trademarks of fashion brands, including the LV Trademarks, for a symposium on fashion law.
The thing is, almost everything that LV's lawyer argues above is wrong about the law -- and the "experts" at UPenn are right that this in no way infringes. Unfortunately, somehow LV's lawyer was able to first get a "communications" guy from the school on the phone who (without understanding any of this) agreed to back down and promised that the poster wouldn't be used. Thankfully, then the lawyers stepped up and said, "no way." A lawyer representing the school responded to LV's lawyer with a little lesson in trademark law (pdf and embedded below). Here's a snippet:
You assert that the clever artwork parody that appears on the poster and invitation is a "serious willful infringement." However, to constitute trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, PIPG has to be using a trademark in interstate commerce, which is substantially similar to Louis Vuitton's mark(s), and which is likely to cause confusion between Louis Vuitton's luxury apparel goods and PIPG's educational conference among the relevant audience. First, I don't believe that PIPG's artwork parody was adopted as, or is being used as, a trademark to identify any goods and services. It is artwork on a poster to supplement text, designed to evoke some of the very issues to be discussed at the conference, including the importance of intellectual property rights to fashion companies.... Second, although you don't cite the actual federal trademark registration that you assert protect your marks, I doubt any of them are registered in Class 41 to cover educational symposia in intellectual property law issues. There is no substantial similarity between the goods identified by Louis Vuitton's marks and the PIPG educational symposium. Third, there is no likelihood of confusion possible here. The lawyers, law students, and fashion industry executives who will attend the symposium certainly are unlikely to think that Louis Vuitton is organizing the conference; the poster clearly says that PIPG has organized the event, with support from Penn Law and a number of nationally-known law firms. The artwork on the poster and invitation does not constitute trademark infringement.

You also state that PIPG's use of its artwork parody knowingly dilutes the Louis Vuitton trademarks. I disagree. First, PIPG has not commenced use of the artwork as a mark or trade name, which is a prerequisite for any liability under 15 U.S.C. 1125(c)(1). More importantly, however, even if PIPG has used the artwork as a mark, there is an explicit exception to any liability for dilution by blurring or dilution by tarnishment for "any noncommercial use of a mark." 15 U.S.S. 1125(c)(3)(c). A law student group at a non-profit university promoting its annual educational symposium is a noncommercial use. Lastly, the artwork is clearly fair use....

There's a bit more in the response letter, including UPenn's lawyer inviting LV's lawyer to attend the event, and asking him to introduce himself. One would hope that LV's counsel will have the good sense to let this matter drop, but it would be kind of fun to see LV get smacked down in court for yet another case of trademark bullying.

61 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
ed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier Handbags

Designing women - Jamaica Gleaner

Tony Deyal, Contributor

If the Devil wears Prada, who wears Louis Vuitton? The answer came this carnival when the prime minister of Trinidad and Tobago, Kamla Persad-Bissessar, showed up at a pre-carnival event, headlining Machel Montano, in a pair of US$795 boots with the Louis Vuitton brand. According to the Trinidad Express, "They are described as a 'punchy sneaker boot in grained leather and sequins Louis Vuitton shoes'."

The responses were mixed - some blaming the newspaper for highlighting celebrity trivia and others saying that it is a bad example for the prime minister to spend so much on shoes when there are children who are starving.

One writer with the nom de plume 'Trini Chick' commented, "I'm no Kamla fan, but I think she's entitled to spend her money how she pleases. More important is the shock in knowing those ugly shoes, that did not match the outfit, cost $5,000. That's the shameful part."

'Lil Trini Woman' advised, "Take your education, do well in school, stay off drugs, and do the right thing, and you will be able to afford things like this."

'Bacteriocidal' was adamant: "Our Caribbean queen deserves the best that money can buy. She worked for her dollar."

One of the prime minister's critics, most likely someone of my generation, remembered the Nancy Sinatra 1966 hit, These Boots Are Made for Walkin. He even quoted some of the lyrics from the chorus, "These boots are made for walkin'/And that's what they will do/And one of these days these boots are gonna/Walk all over you."

Clearly he believes, like many other critics, that the present government of T&T is trampling on the rights of the citizenry, a sentiment similar to the Barbados situation that prompted Gabby's Government Boots in 1984.

Several people also pointed out that carnival costumes cost more than the PM's shoes, and that since it was not the public purse paying for the footwear, there was no problem.

Compared with Mrs O

Comparisons were also made about the difference in style between the T&T prime minister and the US first lady, Michelle Obama. There is, in fact, a website (mrs-o.com) which is dedicated to "following the fashion and style of First Lady Michelle Obama since 2008". The site tells you, for instance, "The president and first lady attended the 2011 National Medal of Arts and Humanities Medal in the East Room at the White House today. On the style front, Mrs O wore a mixed-print wrap dress paired with black boots."

Other fashion titbits include: "Mrs O wears a Rachel Roy Deep Sea Blue Crepe Drape Neck Dress", and the site link lets you know it costs US$445 and also does a "Jason Wu for Target Sleeveless Chiffon Dress in Navy Floral". You are also told that the dress is sold out online but available from some Target stores.

Recently, the first lady wore a "Moschino sheath dress adorned with a fabric rosette at the right shoulder" together with a "diamond brooch by Garavelli", which was an anniversary gift from the president. No Trinidad newspaper comes even close to this "depth" of coverage.

But, is there a Louis Vuitton connection between the T&T PM and the American first lady? A fashion website says, "Supermodel Naomi Campbell has once voiced out her fondness with the Louis Vuitton line and is frequently photographed toting around an LV bag. Professional tennis player Anna Kournikova has also been spotted with an LV limited-edition bag while she was on her way to a party, and even First Lady Michelle Obama has a few Louis Vuitton handbags tucked away in her closet."

A Louis Vuitton bag also featured prominently in a matter involving another political figure - the former prime minister of Grenada, Dr Keith Mitchell. An article in a Trinidad newspaper in August 2007 stated that former T&T Attorney General Ramesh Maharaj was representing Dr Mitchell at a commission of enquiry headed by Dr Richard Cheltenham, investigating allegations made by a journalist in a 2004 Miami newsletter called Offshore Alert.

What's in the bag?

The newsletter claimed that Mitchell took a US$500,000 cash bribe from Eric Resteiner in a Louis Vuitton bag on a trip to Switzerland. Resteiner was made a diplomatic representative of Grenada to Switzerland. Dr Mitchell consistently denied receiving any bribe and maintained that he got US$15,000 as reimbursements. This prompted one critic to say that it is unusual for the receptacle to be worth more than the contents.

The fact that Vuitton has a 'joke' bag has added fuel to the controversy which died down during the carnival season and may be rekindled after Ash Wednesday. The bags are sold as "authentic Louis Vuitton Richard Prince Mancrazy" accessories.

Ashlee Simpson's cost about US$2,200 and another sold for US$3,995. Many of the jokes are from the king of one-liners, Henny Youngman. They include: "Every time I meet a girl who can cook like my mother, she looks like my father." "My wife went to the beauty shop and got a mud pack. For two days she looked beautiful. Then the mud feel off." "I've been married for 30 years and I'm still in love with the same woman. If my wife ever finds out, she'll kill me."

Speaking of bags, Youngman once quipped, "Getting on a plane, I told the ticket lady, 'Send one of my bags to New York, send one to Los Angeles, and send one to Miami.' She said, 'We can't do that!' I told her, 'You did it last week!'"

I suppose that given the designer preoccupation, a joke about the T&T PM's recent trip to India had to emerge. It is said that when the two PMs met, they spent a lot of time discussing the heavy weight of the offices they carried, their burdensome responsibilities, and all the many demands on their time.

The Indian PM, Dr Manmohan Singh, revealed that he was responsible for several ministries, including personnel, public grievances and pensions, as well as planning, atomic energy and space. He then turned to the T&T PM and asked, "And what is your portfolio?" She replied with a proud smile, "Louis Vuitton, of course."

Tony Deyal was last seen saying that it is ironic to find on a US$3,000 Louis Vuitton handbag the following one-liner, "My wife is always asking for money: $200 one day, $150 the next, $125 after that. "That's crazy," my friend said. "What does she do with it all?" "I don't know," I said. "I never gave her any."


ed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier Handbags

Epic Epi range from Louis Vuitton - Independent Online

You want an e-tag?

What you need to know

Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.
ed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier Handbags

2012年3月7日星期三

The rebel tamed: Marc Jacobs interview - Telegraph.co.uk

Columnist

Fifteen years since Louis Vuitton took a gamble on a wild New Yorker, Marc Jacobs has lost none of his power to dazzle.

BY Tamsin Blanchard | 03 March 2012

Designer Marc Jacobs Designer Marc Jacobs Photo: GETTY

By the looks of it, Marc Jacobs has just come back from the gym. He is dressed in a black vest and sweat pants and white Adidas trainers, and is a little flushed.

He is surprisingly small, with the physique of a dancer. He sits at his desk, a huge diamond earring catching the light as he sips an espresso and inhales on a Marlboro Light.

We are in Jacobs's office at the Paris headquarters of Louis Vuitton, where he has been the artistic director since 1997 - it is a temporary attic space in an annexe opposite the impossibly slick main LV building near the Pont Neuf.

'We had to move out of our office across the street,' he explains. 'The air conditioning was not working and we had oily black goo leaking from the ceilings. It's a little bit like Being John Malkovich here. I'm not tall and if I can touch the ceiling…'

He has made himself at home here. The office is lived-in and nicely messy, with shelves lined with a mish-mash of books, some bags from his collaboration with the pop artist Richard Prince, and a bunny creature made for him by one of his interns.

Jacobs, 48, talks quickly, pausing from time to time to light another cigarette, his thoughts tumbling out in a stream of consciousness. His design team is on the same floor - he leaves his door open so he can keep an eye on them and they can approach him at any time.

'We like to share ideas,' he says. 'Each of us stimulates the other and although we all look to each other for that catalyst and inspiration, no one says, "Oh, that was my idea." And I think that makes for a very nice creative environment. It's the only kind of environment I can work in.'

Jacobs is putting the finishing touches to the new Louis Vuitton ready-to-wear collection, the highlight of the Paris shows and the grand finale of the show season.

'Usually, at the end of the show, I am pretty emotional, and physically and mentally worn out, but I'm also very happy with the results of what we have done, regardless of what other people think.'

This year, the show marks the beginning of a whirlwind of Louis Vuitton activity in Paris. A major exhibition, 'Louis Vuitton - Marc Jacobs', will open at the Musée des Arts Decoratifs at the Louvre the following day.

The exhibition compares the lives and careers of Jacobs and Vuitton himself, who began working as an apprentice luggage packer in Paris in the 1820s and founded his own company in 1854. Jacobs seems humbled by it. 'I'm someone who came to Paris as a teenager, and I dreamed of coming back to Paris as a visitor,' he says. 'I never dreamed of having a job at the biggest luxury house in Paris and, you know, 15 odd years later, I'm still here.'

Marc Jacobs was born in New York in 1963. His father, who worked at the William Morris talent agency, died when he was seven. He was never close to his mother (he says he hasn't seen her or his brother or sister for years), and he left home as a teenager to live with his grandmother in the art deco Majestic apartment building on Central Park West.

While he was at the High School of Art and Design, he became a regular all-nighter at Studio 54. He went on to study fashion at Parsons School of Design, where he was a star student, winning the Perry Ellis Gold Thimble award as well as the Design Student of the Year award in 1984. The same year, the entrepreneurial Robert Duffy was looking for a young designer to work with and saw Jacobs's graduation show. The two have worked together ever since. (Duffy has '1984' tattooed on his right hand.)

The first Marc Jacobs collection was launched in 1986 and was greeted with approval by the fashion industry, which awarded him the Perry Ellis award for new fashion talent at the Council of Fashion Designers of America awards in 1987. A year later, and two years after Perry Ellis died, Jacobs and Duffy joined the sportswear company Perry Ellis - then as important as Ralph Lauren and Calvin Klein - as vice president and president of women's design. Jacobs's grunge collection for them, shown in November 1992, has come to be regarded as one of the most influential in fashion history.

The collection of chiffon dresses that looked as though they had come from a thrift store, worn with beanie hats and chunky DMs, with flannel shirts tied round the waist and thermal underwear (remade in cashmere), was simply a reflection of what Jacobs saw around him on the street and in nightclubs. But his bosses at Perry Ellis didn't understand it - they felt he had made their luxury sportswear look cheap. Jacobs's increasing notoriety as a drunken, drug-taking party animal didn't help. He was swiftly fired.

'It was a moment when people questioned what was beautiful,' Jacobs says now. 'I always find beauty in things that are odd and imperfect - they are much more interesting.' In a way, it has simply taken the fashion world a long time to catch up with him. 'There is more freedom in the idea of what glamour is and what beauty is and what is right and what is wrong. It's all changed. It's a different world - all those old cliched definitions have morphed into something less definable.'

When Jacobs arrived at Vuitton in 1997 there was no fashion at the brand, no 'It bags', no Stephen Sprouse graffiti, not even a shoe. In 1987 Louis Vuitton had merged with the champagne manufacturer Mo?t et Chandon and the cognac company Hennessy to form the luxury goods conglomerate LVMH.

In the 1990s Yves Carcelle became the president of Louis Vuitton and he began to oversee a steady expansion and development of the brand. It was he who appointed Jacobs to create the company's first ready-to-wear collection, a move that mirrored the similarly daring appointments of John Galliano at Givenchy in 1995 (followed by Dior in 1996) and Alexander McQueen at Givenchy in 1996.

The French establishment was not convinced. Jacobs had a pretty chequered history and no track record with a luxury goods house. Yet here he was, the nerdy, scruffy New Yorker with his long-haired clubby friends, his drug-fuelled partying and his inappropriate boyfriends at the stuffy Parisian brand known for its perfectly elitist, perfectly unfashionable luggage. But along with Duffy and under the guidance of Carcelle, Jacobs has created a luxury fashion house from scratch.

'When Mr Arnaud [Bernard, the chairman of LVMH] invited Robert and me here, I had made this presentation of all the things I thought Vuitton could eventually be,' Jacobs says. 'As a New Yorker, I was very impatient and I thought those things had to happen within a very short period of time. Fifteen years is a very long time and they still haven't all happened - but it is really remarkable to see how ready-to-wear has grown from one store to five, to seven, to 30…'

Vuitton now has 459 stores in 64 countries. 'The design team has grown, too, and the shoe business has grown [the company has four shoe workshops in Italy]. I had this idea once to do a very beautiful charm bracelet as a symbol of souvenirs and now there is going to be a fine jewellery shop in Place Vend?me. It sounds like it has taken for ever, but it's all gone so quickly.'

The Musée des Arts Décoratifs exhibition will reveal just how far the brand has come. The show is being overseen by Pamela Golbin, the museum's chief curator of fashion and textiles, who has spent the past two years researching the contribution of Vuitton and Jacobs to the company.

'The exhibition is really the story of two men,' Golbin says. 'You forget that there was actually a founder whose name was Louis Vuitton. Louis was not revolutionary, he wasn't ahead of his time - he was a man of his time. To me, Marc is also that. He's always saying, "I'm not the Wizard of Oz, it's not like I have a crystal ball." But they each brought to their prospective areas exactly what was needed.'

Vuitton worked for 17 years for a packer and trunk-maker called Maréchal. His job was to go to the houses of some of the most wealthy women in Paris and pack their clothes, which could easily number 70-plus items, when they needed to travel.

'You actually wore your crinoline,' Golbin explains, 'but there would sometimes be a second one for the evening for the ballgown because it had to be even bigger. It was like a concertina; it had a special bag that was fitted to the trunk. You had to change five to six times a day and there were six to seven layers each time.'

Vuitton was one of about 400 men doing the same job, but Maréchal had clients who would ask for him personally. What singled him out, Golbin says, was an ability to be in the right place at the right time. When he set up his business specialising in packing clothes in 1854, he chose a shop next to Place Vend?me. Four years later, Charles Frederick Worth, the father of haute couture, moved in across the street. It afforded Vuitton an inside knowledge of what was going on in fashion, which allowed him to innovate and keep one step ahead. 'Haute couture was about to explode so Louis became very well known in his field,' Golbin says.

The exhibition will be divided over two floors, one devoted to Vuitton, the other to Jacobs. The Jacobs floor will undoubtedly be the crowd-puller, divided into themes - sparkles, Afro, exotic - and with sections dedicated to the collaborations with the artists Stephen Sprouse, Takashi Murakami and Richard Prince. And, of course, endless bags.

These days, every look has its own bag, but Jacobs's first collection for Vuitton in 1998 featured only one: an anonymous, functional white messenger bag, like a cycle courier's.

'The funny thing is,' Jacobs recalls, 'I was working with [the stylist] Joe McKenna that first season and both Joe and I carried all our stuff in messenger bags, so when it came time to do a bag I thought it should just be something we use every day. It was not about the "It bag" or anything. All of that came afterwards, with the collaborations with Sprouse, Murakami, creating new styles, new bag crazes. But in the beginning it was all about something we take for granted. We couldn't figure out how to start it any other way.'

That first show was minimal in its production, a straight-up-and-down floor-level runway without any of the theatricals that have become Louis Vuitton's signature. 'The first season I tortured myself mentally: "What should we do? What do people expect? Well, we shouldn't give them what they expect. What is luxury?" We looked at this grey trunk [the original Louis Vuitton design] and thought, "We've got to start somewhere." There is no archive of clothes. We had to start from a blank page. So [the model] Kirsten Owen, with that white messenger bag, was the beginning. Everything was internal - the Vuitton label was underneath the buttons. The luxury was hidden, not in your face.'

A lot has changed since then. In October, the show for spring/summer took place on an old-fashioned carousel that had been specially built inside a tent in the Cour Carrée of the Louvre, with 48 white dancing horses, carrying 48 immaculate girls dressed in the frothiest, lightest, sweetest confections it is possible to make. Dresses of broderie anglaise in shades of sugared almonds with bags to match, biker jackets spiked with the most downy ostrich feathers and blouses made from organza with lacy collars buttoned up tight. Kate Moss provided the finale. It was a blow-the-budget extravaganza, and the critics loved it. Jacobs's satisfaction was short-lived. 'I got the one day to enjoy it,' he says, 'then I thought, "How are we going to top that?"'


The carousel at the Louis Vuitton spring/summer 2012 show. Picture: Getty

For a while it seemed as if he would have to top it by moving jobs. Last autumn, Jacobs's future at the house seemed uncertain. There was wild speculation about who would succeed John Galliano, who had been fired from his position at Dior - Jacobs seemed to be the number-one candidate.

I ask if he is relieved the speculation is all over. 'Oh yeah, I am very happy here,' he says. 'I mean, it's a great honour to be considered [for Dior]. But what I have here that is different than what I would have anywhere else is that, before me, there was nobody in this role. With Robert [Duffy] and my team, we've built this and I feel a kind of pride and I don't feel that we're done yet… I just think there is so much more to do.' So was it his choice to stay put? 'Well…' he pauses for a moment. 'It's a little bit more complicated than that, but we agreed that it was probably best for everyone.'

Despite the inescapable luxury of what Jacobs does now for Vuitton, he still has the irreverent attitude he had 20 years ago. 'I still appreciate individuality,' he says. 'Style is much more interesting than fashion, really.'

Jacobs divides his time almost equally between this office in Paris and New York, and continues to run his own eponymous line with 239 (as of summer 2011) Marc Jacobs retail stores in 60 countries, selling the Marc Jacobs Collection, Marc by Marc Jacobs and Little Marc, a children's line. He recently finished renovating a townhouse in the West Village which he bought in 2009, having spent a decade living in the Mercer Hotel. New York remains his home.

The new house gives him somewhere to hang the substantial art collection he began about nine years ago. He has work by Andy Warhol, Georges Braque, John Currin, David Hockney, Ed Ruscha and Richard Prince. The last piece he bought was by the Swiss artist Urs Fischer from the Sadie Coles Gallery, where he likes to go whenever he is in London. It's hanging in his dining-room. When I ask if he is running out of space to hang his art he gives me a look that says I obviously have no idea of the scale of his townhouse. 'No,' he says. 'There's plenty of wall space.'

Whether it was the right decision for Jacobs to remain at Vuitton, time will tell. Certainly, Jacobs is a commercial designer. He has the rare ability to please both the press (though not all of the time) and the buyers. 'Vuitton don't seem to have been affected [by the recession],' he says. 'It's been a great year here, knock wood. I think there is something about luxury - it's not something people need, but it's what they want. It really pulls at their heart. We don't need fashion to survive, we just desire it so much.'

Jacobs prefers not to intellectualise his own work. 'We don't design by calculator or by demographics or anything like that. We really are a group of creative, sensitive people. We have our charmed little world where we get to make things. We're really lucky.'

'Louis Vuitton - Marc Jacobs' is at the Musée des Arts Décoratifs , 107 rue de Rivoli, 75001 Paris, from March 9 to September 16


ed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier Handbags

Louis Vuitton condom trending on Twitter early Thursday Morning - NewsNet5.com

 

Louis Vuitton's International Tour Of Trademark Bullying Runs Smack Dab Into ... - Techdirt

Over the years, we've repeatedly identified Louis Vuitton as one of the biggest trademark bullies around. The company seeks to abuse trademark law to stifle free speech all the time. Anything involving any kind of parody of LV's trademark seems to get a cease and desist. A few examples: LV sued Hyundai because of a silly commercial which (very, very briefly) shows a basketball with a design kinda like the LV monogram pattern in an ad joking about what a more "luxury" world would look like. Even more troubling has been LV's decisions to go after artists commenting on consumerist culture. There was the successful move to shut down an art exhibit by a student who made locust sculptures out of counterfeit LV bags. Then, famously, LV went hard after artist Nadia Plesner who made some t-shirts to benefit victims of the genocide in Darfur. She had made some t-shirts showing a young Darfur victim carrying a bag that had a similar (but not exact) pattern to LV's bag pattern. In all of these cases, LV is clearly abusing both the intent and letter of trademark law to stifle commentary or parody, rather than any real confusion (or even dilution).

It's latest attempt really picked on the wrong target. It seems that students at the University of Pennsylvania's Law School were organizing their annual symposium on intellectual property issues in fashion and came up with the following invite/poster: As you can probably see, the top section of the image is a somewhat clever parody of LV's pattern, replacing segments with a stylized TM to match the stylized LV, and also a ? symbol. And.... LV freaks out. It sent a legal nastygram (pdf and embedded below) demanding the school and the student group cease-and-desist, arguing all sorts or ridiculousness, including arguing that this "infringement" (it's not) was "willful" because as a law school and law students, they should know better (they do -- which is why they know it's not infringing), and taking a particularly obnoxious scolding tone for someone so wrong:

This egregious action is not only a serious willful infringement and knowingly dilutes the LV Trademarks, but also may mislead others into thinking that this type of unlawful activity is somehow "legal" or constitutes "fair use" because the Penn Intellectual Property Group is sponsoring a seminar on fashion law and "must be experts." People seeing the invitation/poster may believe that Louis Vuitton either sponsored the seminar or was otherwise involved, and approved the misuse of its trademarks in this manner. I would have thought the Penn Intellectual Property Group, and its faculty advisors, would understand the basics of intellectual property law and know better than to infringe and dilute the famous trademarks of fashion brands, including the LV Trademarks, for a symposium on fashion law.
The thing is, almost everything that LV's lawyer argues above is wrong about the law -- and the "experts" at UPenn are right that this in no way infringes. Unfortunately, somehow LV's lawyer was able to first get a "communications" guy from the school on the phone who (without understanding any of this) agreed to back down and promised that the poster wouldn't be used. Thankfully, then the lawyers stepped up and said, "no way." A lawyer representing the school responded to LV's lawyer with a little lesson in trademark law (pdf and embedded below). Here's a snippet:
You assert that the clever artwork parody that appears on the poster and invitation is a "serious willful infringement." However, to constitute trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, PIPG has to be using a trademark in interstate commerce, which is substantially similar to Louis Vuitton's mark(s), and which is likely to cause confusion between Louis Vuitton's luxury apparel goods and PIPG's educational conference among the relevant audience. First, I don't believe that PIPG's artwork parody was adopted as, or is being used as, a trademark to identify any goods and services. It is artwork on a poster to supplement text, designed to evoke some of the very issues to be discussed at the conference, including the importance of intellectual property rights to fashion companies.... Second, although you don't cite the actual federal trademark registration that you assert protect your marks, I doubt any of them are registered in Class 41 to cover educational symposia in intellectual property law issues. There is no substantial similarity between the goods identified by Louis Vuitton's marks and the PIPG educational symposium. Third, there is no likelihood of confusion possible here. The lawyers, law students, and fashion industry executives who will attend the symposium certainly are unlikely to think that Louis Vuitton is organizing the conference; the poster clearly says that PIPG has organized the event, with support from Penn Law and a number of nationally-known law firms. The artwork on the poster and invitation does not constitute trademark infringement.

You also state that PIPG's use of its artwork parody knowingly dilutes the Louis Vuitton trademarks. I disagree. First, PIPG has not commenced use of the artwork as a mark or trade name, which is a prerequisite for any liability under 15 U.S.C. 1125(c)(1). More importantly, however, even if PIPG has used the artwork as a mark, there is an explicit exception to any liability for dilution by blurring or dilution by tarnishment for "any noncommercial use of a mark." 15 U.S.S. 1125(c)(3)(c). A law student group at a non-profit university promoting its annual educational symposium is a noncommercial use. Lastly, the artwork is clearly fair use....

There's a bit more in the response letter, including UPenn's lawyer inviting LV's lawyer to attend the event, and asking him to introduce himself. One would hope that LV's counsel will have the good sense to let this matter drop, but it would be kind of fun to see LV get smacked down in court for yet another case of trademark bullying.

44 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
ed hardy clothing
Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier Handbags